Key publications of the ACMRL include:
- N. Mustafa, ‘A Certain Class of Undesirables: ‘Race’, Regulation & Interracialised Intimacies in Britain (1948-1968)‘, PhD, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam;
- J.M. Wessels, ‘Gaps in human Rights Law? Detention and Area-Based Restriction in the Proposed Border Procedures in the EU‘, European Journal on Migration and Law 2023, 25(3), p. 275-300;
- L.M. Komp, ‘Border Deaths at Sea under the Right to Life in the European Convention on Human Rights‘, Routledge Studies in Human Rights Series;
- J.M. Wessels, ‘Deconstructing Doctrinal Struggles through Legal Discourse Analysis. The Example of ‘Discretion’ Reasoning in Refugee Law‘, Zeitschrift für Flucht- und Flüchtlingsforschung (Z’Flucht) 2023, 7(1), p. 136-150;
- Y. Arbaoui, ‘The Impact of the Marrakech Compact for Migration in Morocco: The Role of the Government and of Civil Society‘, Verfassung und Recht in Übersee (World Comparative Law), 55(1), 2022, p. 19-43,
- J.F. Dez, ‘Print Rights with a Thousand Masks: Migrant Vulnerability, Resistance and Human Rights Law‘, Refuge: Canada’s Journal on Refugees, 38(2), 2022, p. 1-17;
- K.J. Swider, ‘Wat betekenen de staatsloosheidswetswijzigingen voor de staatlozen‘; Asiel & Migrantenrecht, Volume 5, 2022, p. 244-253;
- C.H. Slingenberg, ‘European Case Law on migrants’ social and mobility rights: The need for a comparative approach in assessing ‘human rights overreach’‘, Netherlands Quaterly of Human Rights, 40(2), 2022, p. 98-117;
- J. Bast, F. von Harbou & J.M. Wessels, ‘Human Rights Challenges to European Migration Policy. The REMAP Study‘, Baden-Baden and Oxford: Nomos and Hart, 2022;
- M.C. Stronks, ‘Grasping Legal Time – Temporality and European Migration Law‘, Cambridge University Press, 2022;
- T.P. Spijkerboer, ‘Migration management clientelism – Europe’s migration funds as a global political project‘, Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, Volume 48, 2022, p. 2892-2907;
- C.H. Slingenberg, ‘Deservingness in Judicial Discourse. An Analysis of the Legal Reasoning Adopted in Dutch Case Law on Irregular Migrant Families’ Access to Shelter‘, Social Policy and Society, 20(3), 2021, p. 521-530;
- B. de Hart & E. Besselsen, ‘Everything went according to the rules: Female citizen sponsors’ legal consciousness, intimate citizenship and family migration law‘, Global Studies in Culture and Power, 28(1), 2021, p. 37-55;
- B. de Hart & S. Bonjour, ‘Intimate citizenship: introduction to the special issue on citizenship, membership and belonging in mixed-status families‘, Global Studies in Culture and Power, 28(1), 2021, p. 1-17;
- J.M. Wessels, ‘The Concealment Controversy. Sexual Orientation, ‘Discretion’ Reasoning and the Scope of Refugee Protection‘, Cambridge University Press, 2021;
- K. de Vries & T.P. Spijkerboer, ‘Race and the regulation of international migration. The ongoing impact of colonialism in the case law of The European Court of Human Rights‘, Netherlands Quaterly of Human Rights, 39(4), 2021, p. 291-307;
- A.M. Reneman & M.C. Stronks, ‘What are they waiting for? The use of acceleration and deceleration in asylum procedures by the Dutch government, Time and Society, 2021, p. 1-30;
- T.P. Spijkerboer, ‘The geopolitics of knowledge production in international migration law‘, in Catherine Dauvergne (ed), Research Handbook on the Law and Politics of Migration, Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar, 2021, p. 172-188;
- C.H. Slingenberg, ‘Evaluating ‘Life Steeped in Power’: Non-Domination, the Rule of Law and Spatial Restrictions for Irregular Migrants‘, Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, 12(3), 399, 2020, p. 291-314;
- A.M. Reneman, ‘Forensic medical reports in asylum cases: The view of the European Court of Human Rights and the Committee against Torture’, Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights 2020, p. 206-228;
- Y. Arbaoui, ‘Deux Poids, Deux Mesures: A critical frame analysis of the Dutch debate on family-related asylum claims‘, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 2019;
- E. Zambelli, ‘Intimate others and risky tenants: disentangling the economy of affect shaping women’s migratory projects in Italy’, Journal of Political Power, 2019, p. 1-18;
- C.H. Slingenberg, ‘The Right Not to be Dominated: The Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights on Migrants’ Destitution’, Human Rights Law Review, 2019-2, p. 291-314;
- de Hart, B. (2017). The Europeanization of Love. The Marriage of Convenience in European Migration Law. European Journal of Migration and law, 19(3), 281-306;
- C.H. Slingenberg and L. Bonneau, ‘(In)formal Migrant Settlements and Right to Respect for a Home’, European Journal of Migration and Law 2017-4, pp. 335-369;
- de Hart, B. (2017). Protecting Dutch Girls from the Harem. Premarital Counselling for Mixed Marriages with Muslim Men. Journal of Migration History, 3(1), 78-103;
- Battjes, H., Brouwer, E. R., Slingenberg, C. H., & Spijkerboer, T. P. (2016). Preadvies CJV The Crisis of European Refugee Law: Lessons from Lake Success. CJV;
- M. den Heijer, J. Rijpma and T.P. Spijkerboer, ‘Coercion, prohibition, and great expectations: The continuing failure of the Common European Asylum System‘, Common Market Law Review 53 2016-3;
- de Hart, B. (2015). Regulating Mixed Marriages through Acquisition and Loss of Citizenship. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 662(1);
- C.H. Slingenberg, The Reception of Asylum Seekers under International Law. Between Sovereignty and Equality, Oxford: Hart Publishing 2014;
The publications of the staff of the Amsterdam Centre for Migration and Refugee Law can be found on their individual pages.